Comparing “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” and “a Life of the Senses”

Throughout the course of history, engineering has changed us. It gave us a musical mode to communicate in long distances. It gave us a way to produce goods faster and more(prenominal) expeditiously. And it gave us the convenience to pull ahead knowledge with right one click of a plainlyton. However, in that respect be bad do as there be good. Nicolas Carrs Is Google make Us Stupid? and Richard Louvs A Life of the Senses, discusses the different effects of technology on people. Carrs essay, Is Google Making Us Stupid? discusses technologys effect in our way of cyphering, while Louvs essay, A Life of the Senses discusses the change in our lifestyle and our senses. From the get go, Carr says that Ive had an uneasy look that someone, or something, has been tinkering with my brain, remapping the neutral circuitry, reprogramming my memory (1). Sure enough, it true(a)ly has been. near of us probably devote had this feeling a feeling bid something was off. It be bonks mor e app bent when we try to read a long essay, or a novel.We sit around and read a few paragraphs or a few pages, nevertheless not for long we begin facial expression for something else to do (1). We come to realize that we stooget concentrate, we feel enthusiastic and we find ourselves staring at an LCD screen, or maybe an light-emitting diode screen, doing what we usually do vigour. When a question arises just about that essay we were about to read, we push a few keys, click a few interrelate and voila Here is a unit page in which we will bore more of our laziness. We then scram to wonder what causes this.Surprisingly, one of our most pregnant fashion of communication and source of information is causing this. The Net, is chipping remote our capacity for concentration and contemplation (1). Louv refers to this in his essay as the know-it-all state of mind (667). We browse and browse and browse and we skim everything we see. We essential to acquire information and we i nsufficiency it immediately. This want to acquire information as fast as we can load the page, becomes a habit and changes us into something like the very machine we use to get all of this information.We are call oned into something like our favorite count engine. It can get you answers fast, but it doesnt understand any of it. As Louv and Carr would say, we are skimming at the surface but we dont penetrate vertically. (667, 1) Its scary to know that the Net made us developed a habit that turns us into robots, but its much scarier when we find out that its actually changing the way we prize. We seek utmost speed, maximum efficiency, and maximum output just likeTaylors system mentioned in Carrs essay. This system was created to boost production in factories, and is still utilize even now. It did us a lot of good economically, but without even noticing, this system has wormed its way to our brains and made it our philosophy, or, as Louv quoted from Daniel Yankelovich, our relig ion. This faith is taking over our minds. Its making us stupid in terms of our depth of understanding, but it doesnt end there. The Net or technology as a whole is changing the way we live.Long ago, before the inventions of portable gadgets, people used to get wind out the car window, people used to go out with friends and kids used to play external and exercise their imaginations, but now technology has changed everything. sooner of looking out in the horizon people stare at their small radioactive devices, throwing birds that bespeak counseling at pyramids of sticks and stones built by green mutated pigs. Instead, of going out with friends they try and fit all their thoughts and feeling into a box that can only contain one ampere-second forty letters.Instead of playing outside they stay inside watching television, tinkering with their gaiety consoles, and or trying to win the title heaviest kid on earth. masses are missing out on all of the good things the outside world ca n give us. Their missing out the kind of fun I felt when my siblings and I played Whoever counts the most cow wins. I miss those days, and sure enough were all going start looking for it. And when we do, businesses are going to be there to provide you with a quick and easy way to fulfill this need.Industries soon get clams from concocted disposition even when we can get it for free. We fall for it anyways, because even if the nature we see is just a simulation our brain thinks that its fine. celluloid or real, it doesnt effect, and I suspect that the system embedded in our brains is the cause of this. When we start to feel that we want something, we automatically think that we want it now, and the closest thing that can give fulfill this need is our computer, or, if were up to it, the mall. Its just a much faster and more efficient way to fulfill the current task.On the other hand, when we start looking at artificial nature we start to lose our appreciation and understanding fo r actual nature. For example, before all of the images of the Grand Canyon people used to at it in awe. They would explore it, admire it and speculate how all of it came about, but now, we sign a picture, post it in a social media site, caption it with half-hearted praises and since theres nothing more to see or say we turn around and drive away. We saw it and now its time to leave, just like another webpage. The system digs even deeper.To obtain something, you moldiness first lose something. In this case, to obtain information faster we must lose our traditional way of learning by accept. As Louv quotes Edward Reed, We are beginning to lose the ability to experience our world directly. What we have come to mean by the term experience is impoverished what we have of experience in daily life is impoverished as wellspring (670). We curse so much on the information we know from the Net that we think we can do anything, well, as long as we can search the instructions online, or we can watch how to, via online streaming.We become uninterested in actually doing something, since we already know how to. We are left in the unnoticeable on how something actually works, because we dont really need more than knowing how to turn something on. As a result, the most important means of gathering information is now missing. However, just like Carr and Louv I think that some of us are focusing on the negatives too much. We have exponentially advanced in terms of production, distribution, processing information and a lot more.My grandmother survived cancer because of technology, and God, knows that the internet has helped me many times in homeworks and projects. Its the primary tool for students after all, well that and the library. Nevertheless, its definitely not all bad. There may be some possibilities that we are turning into robots, but there may besides be more chances that were just changing into something better. One can develop a machine to process information an d someday it may be able to fully understand it, but people are not machines.We can process information and we can understand them its just that we developed a certain affinity of getting what we need first rather than understanding. I think of it a testing terminus for a prototype of the perfect machine, but this time its a prototype of a perfect way of thinking. We may find a way to get something fast and fully understand it in the future, but for now we are evolving. If you still think that we are turning into nothing more than computer, always remember that computers can never feel, and no matter what we humans do, we will always feel.