Is the Uk political system democratic? Essay

A presidential term of the stack, by the volume, for the people. The word body politic comes from the Greek words demos which meat the people and kratos which representation authority, or power. A pop policy-making placement is one in which the ultimate political authority is vested in the people this means that all eligible citizens ar able to participate evenly either at oncely or through elective representatives in the proposal, development, and base of laws that lead change and shape everyday life. A participatory landed estate aims to contain an accountable organization that serve the best interests of the people it is g everyplacening.The UK is a liberal democracy which ensures that citizens should be able to influence governmental decisions made. The UKs governmental system contains no written constitution. This means that theoretically the government be free to pass any legislation as vast as they have the majority in parliament which could be slow achiev ed if the party has a large majority of seats. This means there is no safeguard for laws that can be altered or new ones that could be created.This is very un parliamentary as the government therefore have besides much power. The government is also in possession of other powers such as the royal prerogative that allows the prime minister to go to fight without consent from parliament. An example of where this was used was the Iraq war in 2003 which was heavily resented by a large majority of the public. The most important thing is that authentic democracy is participatory democracy, where members of the public atomic number 18 in effect(p)ly members of the government by voting directly on policies. However this is difficult to administer and as a result most modern democracies are representative.The public chooses who they concupiscence to possess power and trust that person to devise policies that will make headway them. A representative democracy can easily become an elect ed dictatorship if the populations views are not heard. Considering it from a strictly political stance, democracy is power to the people, which establishes itself through the right to vote. We vote on members of the commonalty however not on the Lords. We vote on local representatives but not party leaders. We vote on people but not policies. We vote people into fantan but not out of it. We vote for a particular party but our second choices are not considered. We vote on just now that which we are asked to vote on. We cannot ensure policies are maintained throughout a ministerial term by our vote. apparently our democracy is far from flawless, and this is not even considering the social aspects of its meaning, i.e. the extent to which we are free police barraging of public protesters and Rupert Murdochs mass media control showed us that we are not quite as free as the democratic terminology seems to suggest. You could say that the UK can be made more democratic through a propo rtional electoral system, compulsory voting, a remotion of unelected members of Parliament and more referendums. But it seems in these examples, more democratic is inversely proportional to more efficient.Proportional electoral systems whitethorn confuse voters and will result in less strong government, compulsory voting would keep back us with the careless votes of those uninterested in politics and therefore would not be an accurate representation of what the population wants a removal of unelected members of Parliament may increase political bias and reduce the expert note value of the Lords. Referendums may be subject to people who do not accredit what is best for the country, and even then provided those who set the agenda of democracy can be understood as a process of people governing their state and managing community affairs all together, based on consensus.The UK is in many ways not democratic. Firstly, the UK amongst many other countries claims to be a democracy. This would suggest that UK citizens have effective influence over government and over decisions that affect them. However there has been much controversy over this claim some arguing that power lies in the hands of scarcely a few and others standing by the allegation that power in the UK is widely distributed. Secondly, First Past The Post has had a big equal on UK democracy.The system we use to elect our MPs has a genuine impact on how politics works in The UK. It has a direct effect on whether politicians truly represent us and whether we can realise them to account if they let us down. The defeat of the 2011 Alternative Vote (AV) referendum means it is now more important than ever to discredit our failed system and we are continuing to build the case for change at Westminster.This in vacate means any of our votes just dont count. Millions of people have no chance of deciding who their MP will be. And our votes are supernumerary by the system. Additionally, parties continue to f ocus all their time, money and effort on a handful of marginal seats, so just a few thousand voters can decide who runs Britain. As Jean-Jacques Rousseau highlighted in The amicable Contract democracy in its political sense can only be efficient when the general will of the people is the same as each and every individual will.Here he argues that this can only be achieved through a classless society with censorship and polite religion. As democracy in modern society is now taken to be equal to freedom its efficiency as a political system is halted by its connotative meaning. This means Rousseaus method of effective and true democracy would be considered undemocratic in the modern world. Britain may not be truly democratic but it is as democratic as it can be whilst maintaining the constancy and competency of its political workings.